{"content":{"sharePage":{"page":0,"digests":[{"id":"41424263","dateCreated":"1313481109","smartDate":"Aug 16, 2011","userCreated":{"username":"lucindaohanlon","url":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/user\/view\/lucindaohanlon","imageUrl":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/i\/user_none_lg.jpg"},"monitored":false,"locked":false,"links":{"self":"https:\/\/ohchrglossary.wikispaces.com\/share\/view\/41424263"},"dateDigested":1532174637,"startDate":null,"sharedType":"discussion","title":"comments from Lucinda","description":"We should refer to the right to sanitation, not the right to &quot;adequate&quot; sanitation. Urban garbage is not part of the right to sanitation. It is relevant in this section insofar as it has an impact on water quality. But other environmental impacts would need to be dealt with elsewhere. The list of activities which threaten water resources seems slightly random to me \u2013 many forms of mining are hazardous, and many other industrial processes also pose problems. <br \/>\n<br \/>\nFor the right to water, we focus on pollution which impacts water for human consumption. This is much narrower than environmental concerns about pollution \u2013 which are of course also important, but important to keep the concepts clear. Maybe this section should not be a subsection in 8? Concerning the right to water, ensuring water quality is broader than pollution. It also involves adequate water treatment (which is necessary also because of naturally occurring hazards such as arsenic), water storage methods, maintenance of the network, regular testing, etc. <br \/>\n<br \/>\nOn sanitation, I would suggest referring to the IE report on the right to sanitation rather than the Sub-Commission report which is outdated now.","replyPages":[{"page":0,"digests":[],"more":0}]}],"more":false},"comments":[]},"http":{"code":200,"status":"OK"},"redirectUrl":null,"javascript":null,"notices":{"warning":[],"error":[],"info":[],"success":[]}}