{"content":{"sharePage":{"page":0,"digests":[{"id":"41687861","dateCreated":"1314343706","smartDate":"Aug 26, 2011","userCreated":{"username":"cristinamichels","url":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/user\/view\/cristinamichels","imageUrl":"https:\/\/www.wikispaces.com\/i\/user_none_lg.jpg"},"monitored":false,"locked":false,"links":{"self":"https:\/\/ohchrglossary.wikispaces.com\/share\/view\/41687861"},"dateDigested":1532174784,"startDate":null,"sharedType":"discussion","title":"principle of proportionality is missing","description":"the principle of proportionality should be mentioned as one of the key elements defining the violation in both short and long entries. In the latter, it is only referred to in an example (ECtHR Lurdo vs Italy), while it should be clearly spelled out as a key element
\n(see also comments on 4.8.1 that apply here as well)","replyPages":[{"page":0,"digests":[],"more":0}]}],"more":false},"comments":[]},"http":{"code":200,"status":"OK"},"redirectUrl":null,"javascript":null,"notices":{"warning":[],"error":[],"info":[],"success":[]}}